Skip to content

  • Projects
  • Groups
  • Snippets
  • Help
    • Loading...
    • Help
    • Support
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in / Register
D
debra1999
  • Project overview
    • Project overview
    • Details
    • Activity
  • Issues 22
    • Issues 22
    • List
    • Boards
    • Labels
    • Milestones
  • Merge Requests 0
    • Merge Requests 0
  • CI / CD
    • CI / CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • CI / CD
    • Value Stream
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Members
    • Members
  • Collapse sidebar
  • Activity
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Issue Boards
  • Debra Morrison
  • debra1999
  • Issues
  • #15

Closed
Open
Opened Sep 28, 2025 by Debra Morrison@debrayko305589
  • Report abuse
  • New issue
Report abuse New issue

The Origins of Ethics


Kantian constructivism: a middle ground? How is ethics totally different from morality? Why does ethics matter? Is ethics a social science? Our editors will assessment what you’ve submitted and decide whether to revise the article. Humanities LibreTexts - What is Ethics? Government of Canada - Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat - What's ethics? A fashionable theist (see theism) may say that, since God is nice, nootropic brain supplement God could not presumably approve of torturing kids nor disapprove of serving to neighbours. In saying this, however, the theist would have tacitly admitted that there is an ordinary of goodness that's independent of God. Without an unbiased normal, it can be pointless to say that God is good; this could mean only that God is approved of by God. It appears due to this fact that, even for individuals who imagine in the existence of God, it is unattainable to give a satisfactory account of the origin of morality by way of divine creation.


A special account is required. There are other attainable connections between religion and morality. It has been said that, even when requirements of excellent and evil exist independently of God or the gods, divine revelation is the only dependable means of finding out what these standards are. An obvious downside with this view is that those that obtain divine revelations, or who consider themselves certified to interpret them, do not all the time agree on what is good and what is evil. Without an accepted criterion for the authenticity of a revelation or nootropic brain supplement health nootropic brain supplement an interpretation, individuals are no better off, so far as reaching ethical settlement is anxious, than they would be if they were to decide on good and evil themselves, with no assistance from religion. Traditionally, a more vital hyperlink between religion and ethics was that religious teachings have been thought to offer a reason for doing what is correct. In its crudest type, the rationale was that those who obey the moral law will be rewarded by an eternity of bliss while everybody else roasts in hell.


In more sophisticated versions, the motivation provided by religion was more inspirational and fewer blatantly self-involved. Whether in its crude or its refined version, or one thing in between, religion does present a solution to one among the nice questions of ethics: "Why ought to I be ethical? " (See beneath Ethics and causes for action.) As will be seen within the course of this article, nevertheless, the reply provided by religion just isn't the just one accessible. Because, for apparent reasons, there is no historic report of a human society in the interval earlier than it had any requirements of right and fallacious, historical past can't reveal the origins of morality. Nor is anthropology of any assist, as a result of all the human societies that have been studied so far had their very own types of morality (besides maybe in probably the most excessive circumstances). Fortunately, another mode of inquiry is available. Because dwelling in social teams is a characteristic that humans share with many other animal species-including their closest relations, the apes-presumably the common ancestor of humans and apes also lived in social teams.


Here, then, in the social behaviour of nonhuman animals and in the speculation of evolution that explains such behaviour may be found the origins of human morality. Social life, even for nonhuman animals, requires constraints on behaviour. No group can stay together if its members make frequent, unrestrained attacks on each other. With some exceptions, social animals generally either refrain altogether from attacking different members of the social group or, if an assault does happen, don't make the ensuing struggle a combat to the death-it is over when the weaker animal reveals submissive behaviour. It isn't troublesome to see analogies right here with human moral codes. The parallels, nevertheless, go much additional than this. Like people, nootropic brain supplement social animals could behave in ways in which profit other members of the group at some price or danger to themselves. Male baboons threaten predators and canopy the rear because the troop retreats. Wolves and wild canine take meat again to members of the pack not present at the kill.


Gibbons and chimpanzees with food will, in response to a gesture, share their meals with different members of the group. Dolphins assist different sick or injured dolphins, swimming under them for hours at a time and pushing them to the floor to allow them to breathe. It may be thought that the existence of such apparently altruistic behaviour is odd, for evolutionary idea states that those who do not battle to survive and reproduce can be eradicated by means of pure choice. Research in evolutionary idea utilized to social behaviour, nonetheless, has shown that evolution need not be so ruthless. Some of this altruistic behaviour is defined by kin selection. The obvious examples are those by which mother and father make sacrifices for his or her offspring. If wolves help their cubs to outlive, it's extra doubtless that genetic characteristics, including the characteristic of serving to their very own cubs, will spread through further generations of wolves.

  • Discussion
  • Designs
Assignee
Assign to
None
Milestone
None
Assign milestone
Time tracking
None
Due date
None
0
Labels
None
Assign labels
  • View project labels
Reference: debrayko305589/debra1999#15