Skip to content

  • Projects
  • Groups
  • Snippets
  • Help
    • Loading...
    • Help
    • Support
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in / Register
I
itagpro-tracker2002
  • Project overview
    • Project overview
    • Details
    • Activity
  • Issues 3
    • Issues 3
    • List
    • Boards
    • Labels
    • Milestones
  • Merge Requests 0
    • Merge Requests 0
  • CI / CD
    • CI / CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • CI / CD
    • Value Stream
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Members
    • Members
  • Collapse sidebar
  • Activity
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Issue Boards
  • Kurtis Bruner
  • itagpro-tracker2002
  • Issues
  • #3

Closed
Open
Opened Sep 21, 2025 by Kurtis Bruner@kurtis05p86358
  • Report abuse
  • New issue
Report abuse New issue

Validity and Reliability of an Accelerometer-Based Player Tracking Device


The objective of this investigation was to quantify both the reliability and validity of a commercially available wearable inertial measuring unit used for athletic tracking and efficiency analysis. The units demonstrated excellent intradevice reliability and blended interdevice reliability depending on the path and magnitude of the utilized accelerations. Similarly, the devices demonstrated combined accuracy when compared to the reference accelerometer with effects sizes starting from trivial to small. A secondary objective was to compare PlayerLoad™ vs a calculated participant load determined utilizing the Cartesian system reported by the producer. Differences had been discovered between devices for iTagPro bluetooth tracker both imply PlayerLoad™ and imply peak accelerations with impact sizes ranging from trivial to excessive, depending on particular person items (Figs 2-4). To quantify device validity, the peak accelerations measured by every device was in comparison with peak accelerations measured using a calibrated reference accelerometer connected to the shaker table. Following the same method to the method described herein, Boyd et al.


CVs of ≤1.10% for system reported PlayerLoad™ though they didn't report device validity. Using a controlled laboratory based mostly impact testing protocol, Kelly et al. Similarly, utilizing a shaker table to use controlled, iTagPro repeatable movement, Kransoff et al. Based on these results, caution needs to be taken when comparing PlayerLoad™ or imply peak acceleration between devices, particularly when partitioning the results by planes of motion. Therefore, there may be a need for additional analysis to determine acceptable filters, thresholds settings, and iTagPro smart tracker algorithms to detect occasions in order to correctly analyze inertial movement. When comparing the results from the Catapult PlayerLoad™ and iTagPro bluetooth tracker calculated player load, we found that PlayerLoad™ is constantly decrease by roughly 15%, suggesting that knowledge filtering techniques affect the Catapult reported results. This becomes problematic if the practitioner does not know the algorithms utilized by the manufacturers to process the uncooked knowledge. ‘dwell time,’ or minimal effort duration will directly affect the reported athlete performance measures.


Therefore, the filtering techniques utilized to the uncooked data, the system settings, iTagPro shop gadget firmware, iTagPro bluetooth tracker and software version used throughout the information collection needs to be reported each by the producer and when research are reported within the literature allowing for iTagPro reviews each more equitable comparisons between research and reproducibility of the analysis. The methods used in the present investigation can be utilized to supply a baseline evaluation of reliability and validity of wearable units whose meant use is to quantify measures of athlete physical efficiency. This methodology employs the application of highly-controlled, laboratory-based mostly, utilized oscillatory movement, and can present a repeatable, verified, iTagPro bluetooth tracker applied movement validated utilizing a calibrated reference accelerometer. This sort of managed laboratory testing can permit for the willpower of the limits of efficiency, iTagPro bluetooth tracker reliability, and validity of gadgets employed to evaluate physical efficiency. While this characterization method offers a performance baseline, iTagPro bluetooth tracker the use of these gadgets in an applied setting sometimes includes inserting the machine in a vest worn by the athlete.


As such, the interplay and relative motion of every system with the vest and the interaction and relative movement of the vest with the athlete will introduce a further stage of variability within the machine recorded information. Further investigation is required to accurately characterize these interactions so as to supply a extra full description of total machine software variability. As the usage of wearable gadgets becomes more ubiquitous, commonplace methods of system reported data verification and validation needs to be required. Standard test strategies with calibrated reference gadgets needs to be used as a basis of comparability to gadget reported measures. Also, since one of many models needed to be faraway from the research as it was an outlier, and several other devices confirmed poor between-gadget reliability, we suggest periodic gadget calibration in order to attenuate the error of measurement and to determine malfunctioning models. A possible limitation of the present examine is that while the experimental protocol was designed to attenuate extraneous vibrations and off-axis error, sources of error iTagPro bluetooth tracker might embrace variations in system hardware together with accelerometer sensitivities and orientation of sensors inside the machine. As well as, slight misalignments of the attachment of the gadgets to the shaker table may lead to small variations in reported accelerations and derived PlayerLoad™ metrics.

  • Discussion
  • Designs
Assignee
Assign to
None
Milestone
None
Assign milestone
Time tracking
None
Due date
None
0
Labels
None
Assign labels
  • View project labels
Reference: kurtis05p86358/itagpro-tracker2002#3